1. Where a written document does not reflect the intentions of the parties, the position of the court is that extrinsic evidence of the intention can be admitted to rectify the written document.

2. Which of the following cases is authority for the principle that parol evidence can be admitted to prove existence of a collateral contract?

3. In ………………………., the court admitted parol evidence to prove the existence of a custom

4. Which of the following is authority for the principle that parol evidence can be admitted to prove the existence of a vitiating factor?

5. As an exception to the parol evidence rule, where the terms of contract are reduced into writing, extrinsic evidence will not be admissible to vary or add onto the written document.

6. In the case of ……………………….., the court held that external evidence cannot be admitted to show that the defendant signed a document as a guarantor and not a purchaser.

7. Extrinsic evidence can be admissible to show that a written agreement is not an agreement.

8. In the case of ………………………, the court held that evidence of oral representations of the model number of a motorcycle would not be admitted to vary the written instrument.

9. All the following cases upheld the general rule on Parol evidence except

10. Which of the following cases is authority for the principle that parol evidence can be admitted to resolve ambiguities in a written contract?